Legislative Alert: Is your law practice an S-Corp?

June 25, 2010 Update

The Tax Extenders Bill has been tabled after a third cloture attempt failed yesterday. This is the bill that included the provision to subject all business income from certain S corporations to employment taxes. Senator Snowe (R-Maine) cited the “anti-abuse” provisions for S corporations as one of the reasons for voting against cloture.

The future of the bill is uncertain at this time but don’t breathe too easy — it is likely that the payroll tax issue for S corporations will arise again.

Now is the time to get ready by consulting your tax advisor. Prepare by understanding the tax impact on your practice, which could be substantial, and consider making other tax moves to get ready.

June 23, 2010 Update

The Tax Extenders Bill is still being debated in the Senate. Various amendments are being considered to either ensure the number of votes for passage, or pay for the extended tax benefits. The federal budget deficit is now a hot issue that affects this and other legislation.

However, the provision affecting S corporation shareholders is still in the bill, and when this bill does pass it’s my expectation that it will still be in there, which means many professionals will see a significant tax impact.  Contacting your tax professional to plan ahead — even if it’s just getting an idea of the additional tax you’re likely to pay — is smart strategy.  See below for a discussion of the S-Corp provision.

The Tax Extenders and Unemployment Bill I wrote about last week was passed by the House and now goes to the Senate.  Read on to see how your S-Corp may be affected.

——-

May 24, 2010

Legislation scheduled to hit the House floor this week would impose Social Security and Medicare taxes on all income derived from professional service businesses.  This is a House amendment to a Senate amendment to HR 4213 (Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act of 2010).  That means if it passes the House all income of professional service businesses formed as S-Corporations or Partnerships or Limited Liability Companies would be subject to payroll taxes beginning sometime in 2010.

Social Security taxes are imposed on compensation and self-employment income up to the Social Security Wage Base (currently $106,800) and the Medicare tax is imposed on all self-employment and compensation income.  Under the current tax law, many professional service firms are set up as S-Corporations owned by the professionals in an effort to minimize income subject to payroll taxes.  The S-Corporation earns the professional fees and pays the shareholder-professional wages that are less than the income earned by the S-Corporation. Any income in excess of the wages is then treated as earnings of the S-corporation allocated to the shareholder-professional and not subject to payroll taxes.

This legislation would change that.  In situations where an S-corporation is in a professional service business that is principally based on the reputation and skill of 3 or fewer individuals or an S corporation that is a partner in a professional service business, all of the earnings of the S-Corporation allocated to the shareholder-professional would be subject to employment taxes. The bill would also clarify that individuals that are engaged in professional service businesses are unable to avoid employment taxes by routing their earnings through a limited liability corporation or a limited partnership.

If this measure passes — and it could pass this week — it could impact the tax planning of many professionals.  If your practice is an S-Corporation, contact your accountant to understand the implications.